Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Aizawa v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
99 T.C. 197 (1992)


Facts

In 1981, Joseph and Noriyo Aizawa (plaintiffs) purchased property and paid part of the purchase price with a $90,000 loan from the sellers. In return for the loan, the Aizawas gave the sellers a recourse mortgage on the property, which was secured by collateral. In 1987, the Aizawas defaulted on the loan repayments. At the time, the Aizawas’ basis in the collateral was $100,091.38. The sellers obtained a default judgment of $133,506.91 against the Aizawas, which included the loan’s principal, interest, attorney’s fees, and court costs. The collateral’s foreclosure sale price was only $72,700, which was the amount realized on the sale for the purpose of claiming a loss deduction under § 1001(a) of the federal tax code. The Aizawas applied § 1001(a) to claim a $70,898.29 loss on the foreclosure sale, a figure that the Aizawas derived by using a complex formula incorporating all of the relevant sums. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) subtracted the Aizawas’ mortgage principal from their basis in the collateral, and calculated that the Aizawas’ actual loss was only $10,091.38. The commissioner disallowed the balance of the Aizawas’ loss deduction. Aizawa filed a petition challenging the commissioner’s determination.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Tannenwald, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.