Ajax Tool Works, Inc. v. Can-Eng Manufacturing Ltd.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
2003 WL 223187 (2003)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The Canadian company Can-Eng Manufacturing Ltd. (Can-Eng) (defendant) entered into a contract with the American company Ajax Tool Works, Inc. (Ajax) (plaintiff) for the sale and purchase of a factory furnace. The contract expressly warranted that Can-Eng’s furnace would meet specified performance standards. The contract also contained a limited warranty that obligated Can-Eng to repair furnace defects for only 90 days after delivery. After that period had expired, and over the next four years, Ajax repeatedly complained to Can-Eng that the furnace’s failure to perform as promised was causing costly production problems. Can-Eng responded to these complaints by attempting to remedy matters at no cost to Ajax. When these attempts proved unsuccessful, Ajax sued Can-Eng in federal district court, alleging breach of express and implied warranties. The court applied Ontario law and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) to the case. The court granted Can-Eng’s motion to preclude Ajax from recovering consequential damages. The court then turned to Can-Eng’s motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Holderman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.