Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Ake v. Oklahoma

United States Supreme Court
470 U.S. 68 (1985)


Facts

Ake (defendant) was charged with murder and attempted murder. Because of his erratic behavior during court proceedings, the trial judge ordered a psychiatric evaluation. Based on the findings of the evaluation, Ake was committed to a psychiatric hospital. After receiving treatment and medication, Ake was deemed competent to stand trial. Ake’s attorney requested that the state provide funding for a psychiatric evaluation to assess Ake’s sanity at the time of the crime. The trial court declined to provide a state-subsidized evaluation. At trial, there was no expert witness who could testify as to Ake’s mental state during the commission of the crime. The jury was instructed that Ake bore the burden of proving that he could be found not guilty by reason of insanity. The jury found Ake guilty on all counts. At Ake’s sentencing hearing, doctors testified about his mental condition and his continuing danger to society. Ake had no expert witness to rebut the doctors’ testimony. Ake was sentenced to death. Ake appealed and argued that he should have been provided a court-appointed psychiatrist. The court of appeals affirmed Ake’s conviction and sentence. Ake petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence (Burger, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.