Akiona v. United States

938 F. 2d 158 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Akiona v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
938 F. 2d 158 (1993)

Facts

Dennis Kaululaau threw a hand grenade into the parking lot of a restaurant, injuring Aaron Akiona, Adam Baker, and Edward Moore (the victims) (plaintiffs). Kaululaau, who was convicted of attempted murder, never explained how he obtained the grenade. However, investigation revealed the grenade to be one of thousands manufactured for the United States government (defendant) in the late 1960s. Because the government maintained a policy of destroying records relating to grenades, it was unknown what happened to the grenade between its initial shipment and its later use by Kaululaau. The victims brought an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, arguing that the government was liable for negligence in allowing Kaululaau to obtain the grenade. The federal district court ruled in favor of the victims, relying on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur—i.e., “the thing speaks for itself”—to find that the injuries would not have occurred had the government not been negligent. The court also held that the government’s destruction of records shifted the burden of proof to the government. The government appealed the finding of liability. The victims cross-appealed the amount of damages assessed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rymer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership