Aksamit v. Krahn

227 P.3d 475 (2010)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Aksamit v. Krahn

Court of Appeals of Arizona
227 P.3d 475 (2010)

Facts

Patricia Aksamit (plaintiff) sought a divorce from her husband, Greg Krahn (defendant). Aksamit and Krahn had two minor children. Both Aksamit and Krahn sought sole legal custody with parenting time for the other parent. The trial judge appointed a best-interests attorney. A best-interests attorney is a court-appointed attorney who acts in a representative capacity and may urge the court to reach a decision based upon the evidence presented, but who may not submit a report into evidence or testify at trial. The best-interests attorney was not a sworn witness, but the trial court requested a report, which the attorney provided. The attorney detailed a series of interactions and interviews with Aksamit, Krahn, and the children. The attorney recommended that Aksamit be granted sole legal custody and that Krahn receive parenting time. The court relied heavily upon the attorney’s opinions in making its custody determination and followed the attorney’s recommendations. Greg appealed, alleging that it was improper for the trial court to consider the best-interests attorney’s report in making its custody determination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Barker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership