Al Hirschfeld Foundation v. Margo Feiden Galleries Ltd.

296 F. Supp. 3d 627 (2017)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Al Hirschfeld Foundation v. Margo Feiden Galleries Ltd.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
296 F. Supp. 3d 627 (2017)

Facts

Al Hirschfeld was a renowned cartoonist. Margo Feiden and her art galleries (the gallery) (defendants) began selling Hirschfeld’s works in 1969. After a dispute in 2000, the parties’ relationship was governed by a settlement agreement, which was in effect when Hirschfeld died in 2003, at which time the Al Hirschfeld Foundation (the foundation) (plaintiff) succeeded to his rights and obligations. Under the agreement’s terms, the gallery handled Hirschfeld’s originals and limited-edition lithographs, photostatic copies of his work, and giclées (high-quality reproductions produced on an inkjet printer). The agreement authorized the gallery to grant limited-purpose licenses to third parties and appointed the gallery as the exclusive representative for selling original works, licensing certain reproductions, and producing a specified number of new, limited-edition prints. The agreement also provided that the foundation retained all rights not expressly granted to the gallery and allowed the foundation to terminate the agreement for cause by giving the gallery 90 days’ written notice, defining cause as a material breach not cured within 30 days of notice. The gallery twice breached the agreement when it infringed the foundation’s copyright by making unauthorized giclée reproductions and when it failed to maintain custody or control of 20 original Hirschfeld cartoons. The foundation sued the gallery for the breaches and served a termination notice calling for the gallery to cure the breaches within 30 days. After the 90-day notice period expired, the foundation terminated its agreement with the gallery and then sought summary judgment that it validly terminated the agreement based on the gallery’s breaches. The facts supporting the foundation’s allegations of the gallery’s breaches were not disputed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Engelmayer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership