Al Hirschfield Foundation v. Margo Feiden Galleries Ltd.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
438 F. Supp. 3d 203 (2020)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
The Al Hirschfield Foundation (AHF) (plaintiff) sued Margo Feiden Galleries Ltd. and its owner, Margo Feiden (collectively, MFG) (defendants), resulting in protracted litigation. AHF alleged, among other things, that MFG converted certain artworks by cartoonist Al Hirschfield that AHF had consigned to MFG. The district court issued various orders throughout the litigation, including (1) orders requiring MFG to return consigned artworks to AHF, (2) orders requiring MFG to produce records related to consigned works, and (3) an order prohibiting MFG from selling any consigned works without AFH’s approval. After the district court granted summary judgment in AHF’s favor and set an evidentiary hearing to determine damages, MFG announced that it recently discovered four of the missing artworks on its premises, as well as records regarding Feiden’s sale of a fifth work. AHF filed a motion asking the court to impose civil-contempt sanctions on MFG for violating the court’s earlier orders by (1) failing to reveal its possession of some of the missing works, (2) failing to produce records, and (3) selling a work without AHF’s permission. The district court considered AFH’s motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Engelmayer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.