Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government

United States Supreme Court
522 U.S. 520 (1998)


Facts

The Neets’aii Gwich’in Tribe (Tribe) (respondent) was living in far northern Alaska on land initially set aside as an Indian reservation. In 1971, the federal government passed the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. The ANCSA sought to revoke the reservation status of the land and to transfer ownership and management of the land to state-chartered private corporations formed under the ANCSA and managed by the Native Alaskans. The reservation land was transferred to the Tribe in fee simple, without restriction. In 1986, the private corporations contracted to build a school on the land. The private corporations imposed taxes on the contractor and on the State of Alaska (petitioner), as a party to the agreement, for conducting business on tribal land. The State of Alaska sued to prevent the Tribe from collecting the tax. The State of Alaska argued that the Tribe was no longer a dependent Indian community under the Indian Country Act (ICA), 18 U.S.C. § 1151(b), and that the land of the Tribe was not Indian country on which the Tribe could impose a tax. The United States District Court for the District of Alaska ruled in favor of the State of Alaska and held that the land was not Indian country. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. The ninth circuit held that the land was Indian country. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.