From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Alaskan Oil v. Central Flying Service
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
975 F.2d 553 (1992)
Alaskan Oil, Inc. (Alaskan) (plaintiff) bought an airplane from Central Flying Service, Inc. (Central Flying) (defendant) for $65,000. Central Flying sold the airplane on behalf of its actual owner, G. W. Davis Construction Company (Davis) (defendant), and kept $53,000 of the sale price in collection of the debt that Davis owed to Central Flying for having repaired and stored the airplane prior to the sale. However, shortly after the sale, Alaskan had multiple issues with the airplane and made several major repairs, ultimately uncovering significant amounts of corrosion. Alaskan was forced to salvage the airplane due to the extensive corrosion approximately one year after purchase. Alaskan sued Davis and Central Flying in federal district court in Arkansas, bringing breach-of-warranty, fraud, and products-liability claims under Arkansas law. A jury found no wrongdoing that would support liability on the breach-of-warranty and fraud claims. However, under a strict-liability theory that did not require any proof of wrongdoing, the jury found that Davis and Central Flying had sold Alaskan an unreasonably dangerous plane and awarded Alaskan $54,500 on its products-liability claim. Central Flying appealed the judgment, arguing that (1) strict liability was not the correct standard for a products-liability claim if the only damage was to the product, (2) the airplane was not unreasonably dangerous when it was sold, and (3) Central Flying was merely Davis’s selling agent and not a supplier that could be held responsible for a products-liability claim.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.