Aldrich v. Basile
Florida Supreme Court
136 So. 3d 530 (2014)
In 2004, Ann Dunn Aldrich made a will using a preprinted will form. The will contained several specific devises to Ann’s sister, Mary Jane Eaton, and provided that, should Mary Jane predecease Ann, the specific devises were to go to Anne’s brother, James Michael Aldrich (plaintiff). The specific devises included three bank accounts. Ann’s will did not include a residuary clause or any other language disposing of property acquired after the signing of the will. Mary Jane died in 2007, leaving Ann cash and land. Instead of depositing the cash into one of her existing bank accounts, Ann opened a new account for the inherited cash. In 2008, Ann attached to her will a handwritten, signed document expressing her desire that James inherit all her property, including the inheritance she had received from Mary Jane. Ann did not revise her will before her death in 2009. After Ann’s death, James initiated an adversary proceeding in probate court, arguing that he should receive all of Ann’s property, including the cash and land she had inherited from Mary Jane. Laurie Basile and Leanne Krajewski (the nieces) (defendants), the daughters of a brother who had predeceased Ann, argued that the inherited property should be distributed pursuant to state intestacy law. The nieces reasoned that the lack of a residuary clause in Ann’s will meant that the will provided no means for disposing of after-acquired property or of property not identified in the will and that Anne had therefore died intestate with regard to the inherited property. The trial court entered summary judgment for James. The court of appeal reversed, and James petitioned the state supreme court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Quince, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 707,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.