Alekseev v. Russian Federation

Communication No. 1873/2009, UN Doc. CCPR/C/109/D/1873/2009 (2013)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Alekseev v. Russian Federation

United Nations Human Rights Committee
Communication No. 1873/2009, UN Doc. CCPR/C/109/D/1873/2009 (2013)

Facts

Nikolai Alekseev (plaintiff) was a gay-rights activist living in the Russian Federation (Russia) (defendant). On three occasions, Alekseev requested permission to hold gay-pride parades or pickets, but the municipal authorities denied the requests. Alekseev submitted applications to the European Court of Human Rights, alleging that these denials violated his fundamental right to peacefully assemble on the subject of gay rights. Alekseev then requested permission to hold a picket outside the Iranian embassy in Moscow to protest Iran executing people for homosexuality. The authorities again denied Alekseev’s request, stating that the protest’s subject matter might provoke a negative response that would endanger the protestors. Alekseev challenged the denial in the district court and then the Moscow City Court, but both courts rejected his complaint. Alekseev’s only remaining domestic option was to request discretionary review from a supervisory court. Because the supervisory court had recently declined to review a highly similar complaint, Alekseev believed that requesting discretionary review would be futile. Instead, Alekseev filed a communication with United Nations Human Rights Committee (committee) under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Russia had joined the ICCPR, which required it to protect the right to peacefully assemble, and agreed to the Optional Protocol, which allowed the committee to hear complaints about possible ICCPR violations. Alekseev alleged that Russia had violated the ICCPR by denying his right to peaceful assembly. Russia argued that the matter was not admissible for consideration because Alekseev (1) had not exhausted all his domestic avenues for relief and (2) was already seeking relief from the European Court of Human Rights on the same issues. On the merits, Russia contended that it had not violated the ICCPR because it had denied Alekseev’s assembly for legitimate security reasons. The committee considered the matter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership