Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Alevromagiros v. Hechinger Co.

993 F.2d 417 (1993)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

Alevromagiros v. Hechinger Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

993 F.2d 417 (1993)

Facts

Restaurant owner Theodore Alevromagiros (plaintiff) directed a contractor to purchase a ladder from a store owned by Hechinger Company (Hechinger) (defendant). The six-foot long stepladder, manufactured by White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corporation (White Metal) (defendant), was successfully used. Several months later, Alevromagiros used the ladder to reset some ceiling tiles. Alevromagiros felt the ladder bending, and two eyewitnesses reported that the ladder twisted, causing Alevromagiros to fall backwards onto the floor, severely fracturing his arm. Alevromagiros brought a products-liability action against Hechinger and White Metal. At trial, the only expert witness to testify was Alevromagiros’s expert, Stanley Kalin, who had a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering. Kalin highlighted the buckling of the spreader bars, which connected the front and rear parts of the ladder, and the twisted appearance of the ladder. Kalin pointed out the absence of safety features such as triangular bracing, better-designed spreaders, and stiffeners. Kalin acknowledged on cross-examination that there were advisory industry standards promulgated by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and Underwriters Laboratories (UL). Kalin admitted the ladder complied with UL standards but disputed compliance with the ANSI standard. Kalin felt the standards were inadequate in not requiring triangular braces on the rear portion of a ladder. Alevromagiros never introduced and Kalin never examined or tested an undamaged model of the ladder because the local Hechinger store had stopped carrying them. Alevromagiros sought to introduce a competitor’s ladder containing additional safety features, which the judge refused to admit. The trial court granted Hechinger and White Metal’s motion for a directed verdict because Alevromagiros had not established the violation of any standard. Alevromagiros appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Restani, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 619,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership