Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

Alexander v. Scheid

Indiana Supreme Court
726 N.E.2d 272 (2000)


Facts

In June 1993, 60-year-old JoAnn Alexander (plaintiff) had a chest X-ray taken in preparation for hip surgery. The report noted a “density” in Alexander’s lungs and recommended that the current X-ray be compared with previous ones. Alexander’s doctor, Kevin Scheid (defendant), received the report but did not follow up. In spring of 1994, Alexander saw a different doctor after she began spitting up blood. A second X-ray showed a large mass in her lung, and a biopsy revealed it to be cancerous. The cancer had metastasized. Following chemotherapy and radiation, Alexander entered remission in October 1994. Alexander and her husband, Jack (plaintiff), sued Scheid and Orthopaedics Indianapolis (defendants) for medical malpractice and loss of consortium. The complaint alleged that the defendants’ negligence had caused Alexander physical harm, reduced life expectancy, and emotional distress. In depositions, experts for Alexander opined that in June 1993, her cancer was in Stage I with no metastasis and approximately 70 percent chance of recovery; by May 1994, the cancer was in Stage IIIa with a five-year survival rate of approximately 20 percent. The defendants moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted on the grounds that Alexander had no current physical injury and could not recover for an increased risk of injury that might or might not occur in the future. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Boehm, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 139,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.