United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 687 (1931)
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Alford (defendant) for mail fraud. One of Alford's former employees testified against him at trial. At the time, the witness was being detained on felony criminal charges. On cross examination, Alford's lawyer asked the witness where he lived in an attempt to elicit testimony regarding the witness’s detention, and consequently, to explore whether being in custody created any bias or gave the witness any incentive to give false testimony. However, the judge excluded the question as immaterial and improper. The judge reasoned a witness's felony conviction might be material to the witness’s credibility, but mere detention on criminal charges would not. The jury convicted Alford, and the appeals court upheld the conviction. On appeal to the United States Supreme Court Alford argued it was reversible error to disallow questioning of the employee about his residence.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.