Alfred Bell & Co., Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
191 F.2d 99 (1951)
- Written by Cynthia (Anderson) Beeler, JD
Facts
Catalda Fine Arts, Inc. (Catalda) (plaintiff) produced mezzotint engravings of paintings no longer covered by copyright. The process to reproduce the paintings by mezzotint engraving was laborious, requiring the painting to be traced by hand onto metal plates and scraped to produce light and shadow. The scraping was then turned into a steel plate that would have the appropriate colors of the painting hand-applied whenever a print was produced. Catalda claimed copyright protection for eight of the mezzotint engravings. Alfred Bell & Company, Ltd. (Alfred Bell) (defendant) used the eight mezzotint engravings to produce color lithographs for sale. Catalda brought suit against Alfred Bell for copyright infringement. The district court found that the mezzotint process involved the individual skill and judgment of the engraver in making the reproductions, and that Alfred Bell thus had infringed upon Catalda’s copyrights. Alfred Bell appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Frank, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.