Ali v. Wang Laboratories, Inc.

162 F.R.D 165 (1995)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
A
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ali v. Wang Laboratories, Inc.

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
162 F.R.D 165 (1995)

Facts

Ali (plaintiff) was employed by Wang Laboratories, Inc. (Wang) (defendant) from 1978 to 1993. Ali claimed he suffered a work-related injury that caused spurs on his vertebrae and indented the thecal sac in his spine, causing him a variety of chronic physical problems and permanently limiting his range of motion and abilities. Ali argues his injury is a disability for purposes of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). However, Ali argues that Wang fired him in violation of the ADA, as well as other federal and state laws, on the basis of his disability, age, and national origin. Ali sought damages for severe emotional and mental distress caused by the termination that resulted in his suffering a mental condition and severe emotional problems. Ali claims he can still perform his essential job functions and seeks reinstatement. Wang denies this. Wang sought to have physical and mental examinations of Ali and filed a motion to compel those examinations. Ali objected, and the magistrate judge heard oral arguments on the issue.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Steele, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms