Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran

California Court of Appeal
102 Cal. Rptr. 3d 343 (2009)


Facts

Bao Tran (defendant) worked as an intellectual-property attorney for Align Technology (Align) (plaintiff), including drafting and prosecuting patent applications. Align fired Tran for using Align’s confidential information to help a competitor. In 2005, Align sued Tran and several others connected to the competitor for: (1) unfair competition, (2) trade-secret misappropriation, (3) breach of contract, (4) conversion, and (5) breach of loyalty. Tran filed a cross-claim against Align for: (1) wrongful termination and (2) breach of contract. These claims were all settled in 2006. Align also discovered that, between 2004 and 2005, Tran operated a law firm as a side business, filing roughly 10 times as many patent applications for his firm as he filed for Align. One of Tran’s side-business applications even used the exact language from an Align application. In 2008, Align sued Tran for this side-business activity, alleging: (1) breach of contract, (2) violation of fiduciary duties and duties of loyalty, and (3) conversion of corporate property. Tran demurred on the ground that Align had failed to bring these claims as compulsory counterclaims in the 2005 litigation. The trial court dismissed the claims without leave to amend. Align appealed to the California Court of Appeal.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Duffy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.