From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Allard Enterprises, Inc. v. Advanced Programming Resources, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
146 F.3d 350 (1998)
Barry Heagren (defendant) and Charles Allard were both employed by AGS Information Systems (AGS), a company that placed contract workers in the computer and data processing fields. AGS sometimes used the mark “APR” in connection with its services, but it eventually abandoned the mark in 1988. In 1989, Heagren started Advanced Programming Resources, Inc. (Advanced Programming Resources) (defendant), a company that offered employee-placement services similar to those offered by AGS. Heagren referred to his company, Advanced Programming Resources, by its acronym, APR. In 1993, Allard left AGS and started Allard Enterprises, Inc. (Allard Enterprises) (plaintiff), which was also an employee-placement business. Allard began using the mark APR OF OHIO on behalf of Allard Enterprises in 1994. By 1996, Allard had registered the mark APR OF OHIO with both the state of Ohio and the federal government. Allard Enterprises sued Advanced Programming Resources and Heagren, alleging trademark infringement and seeking to stop Heagren from using the APR mark. At trial, Heagren provided evidence that he had used the APR mark several times on letterhead and resumes while attempting to place employees or generate business prior to Allard’s 1994 use of the APR Ohio mark. The district court concluded that there was sufficient evidence that Heagren had used the APR mark commercially and continuously before Allard registered it or started using it in 1994, giving Heagren ownership rights in the mark. For this reason, the district court granted permanent injunctive relief to the Heagren and Advanced Programming Resources. Allard Enterprises appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.