Allemeier v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
90 T.C.M. 197 (2005)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
Daniel Allemeier (plaintiff) worked at Selane Products (Selane) in a variety of positions for three years before getting a master’s degree in business administration (MBA). Before enrolling, the CEO of Selane told Allemeier that an MBA would enhance his skills and help him advance at the company. However, Selane did not require Allemeier to get an MBA and did not reimburse him for the cost. While getting his degree, Allemeier continued to work at Selane and was promoted several times during the course of the program. Allemeier deducted the cost of his tuition on his income-tax return as a business expense. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) disallowed the deduction, arguing that the MBA was both a minimum education requirement for Allemeier’s continued employment at Selane and that the MBA qualified Allemeier for a new trade or business. Either argument would have barred Allemeier from deducting the cost of his MBA. Allemeier disagreed with both characterizations, instead arguing that his continued employment was not dependent on his getting an MBA and that the MBA would give him better background knowledge and improve his skills at work he was already engaged in. Allemeier petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kroupa, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.