Allen Archery Inc. v. Browning Manufacturing Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
898 F.2d 787, 14 U.S.P.Q.2d1156 (1990)
Allen Archery, Inc. (Allen) (plaintiff) sued Browning and Browning Manufacturing Co. (defendants) in federal court for infringement of the 495 patent, arguing that Browning Manufacturing violated a licensing agreement for the patent. During the ongoing proceedings, Browning and Browning Manufacturing requested a stay for the resolution of another pending case whose outcome could eliminate the need for trial or reduce the trial’s scope. Allen first opposed the stay but joined the stay request at the suggestion of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Six claims were invalidated in the other pending case. After the stay was lifted, the district court found infringement of the 495 patent and held that (1) the patent-licensing agreement between Allen and Browning Manufacturing was enforceable, (2) Browning Manufacturing breached the agreement, and (3) Allen was entitled to recover royalties pursuant to the licensing agreement. The district court ruled that Allen could receive prejudgment interest except for the three-year period of the stay. Allen was awarded damages of over $1.6 million and over $950,000 in prejudgment interest. Both parties appealed. Browning and Browning Manufacturing argued that because Allen’s only business was patent licensing, Allen did not miss out on any uses for the money that Browning and Browning Manufacturing would have paid in royalties if the license had been honored, and that therefore prejudgment interest was improper.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Friedman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.