Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board

315 U.S. 740 (1942)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board

United States Supreme Court

315 U.S. 740 (1942)

Facts

Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 (the union) (plaintiff) was a labor union made up of employees of Allen-Bradley Co. (the company), a manufacturing company. In 1939, the company canceled its contract with the union. On May 11, 1939, the union called a strike, which lasted for three months. The company continued to operate during the strike, and conflicts arose between the striking employees and those who continued to work. Accusing the union of engaging in unfair labor practices, the company filed a petition against the union with the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (the state board). The union argued that the state board did not have jurisdiction over the dispute but that the dispute was instead subject only to the provisions of the federal Wagner Act, which regulated interactions between employers and labor unions, and the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Nevertheless, the state board determined that the union was guilty of unfair labor practices because, among other things, the union’s members and officers had prevented working employees from going to work; obstructed the company’s entrances and exits, as well as public streets around the factory, through mass picketing; and threatened working employees and their property. The state board ordered the union to cease and desist. The state circuit court sustained and enforced the state board’s order. Because the NLRB chose not to exercise jurisdiction over the case, the Wisconsin Supreme Court found that there was no conflict between Wagner Act and the order of the state board, and it affirmed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership