Allen v. Avon Products

55 FEP Cases 1662 (1988)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Allen v. Avon Products

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
55 FEP Cases 1662 (1988)

Facts

Lorraine Allen (plaintiff) was an employee at Avon Products, Inc. (Avon) (defendant). On January 28, 1972, Avon fired Allen. On August 29, 1972, Allen filed a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), contending that Avon committed sex discrimination by firing her. Allen filed the claim with the EEOC 215 days after she was fired by Avon. The EEOC forwarded the claim to the New York State Division of Human Rights (agency), the state agency responsible for investigating discrimination claims. On August 31, 1972, the agency acknowledged receipt of Allen’s papers from the EEOC. Later, on July 1, 1981, the EEOC issued Allen a right-to-sue letter. On September 29, 1981, Allen filed a complaint in federal court, asserting that Avon violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). Avon filed a motion for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kram, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership