Allen v. Town of North Hempstead

478 N.Y.S.2d 919 (1984)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Allen v. Town of North Hempstead

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
478 N.Y.S.2d 919 (1984)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

Leonard Allen (plaintiff) was interested in purchasing a condominium in the Town of North Hempstead’s (defendant) Golden Age Residence District. In order to reside in this special district, the code of the Town of North Hempstead required an age minimum of 62 years. Allen was over 62 years of age, but the code also had a requirement that seniors who apply for residence in the district must have resided in the Town of North Hempstead for a minimum of one year before applying. Allen, because he was not a resident of the Town of North Hempstead, was precluded from purchasing a unit. Allen challenged the residency requirement of the town code and sought a declaratory judgment. The district court found the ordinance to be invalid and unconstitutional. The Town of North Hempstead appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership