Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson
United States Supreme Court
513 U.S. 265 (1995)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc. (Allied-Bruce) (defendant) contractually agreed to provide lifetime termite protection for a house. The Dobsons (plaintiffs) bought that house and discovered that it was infested with termites. The Dobsons sued Allied-Bruce in Alabama state court for breaching the termite-protection agreement. However, the termite-protection agreement contained a clause requiring private arbitration of any disputes regarding the agreement. Citing this clause, Allied-Bruce moved to stay the lawsuit and to force the Dobsons to arbitrate the dispute instead. Alabama had a state law making predispute arbitration agreements unenforceable, but Allied-Bruce argued that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) pre-empted that state law and required enforcement of the arbitration clause. Allied-Bruce was a multistate entity and had imported some materials from other states for its termite-protection efforts, which meant that the termite-protection agreement had a slight effect on interstate commerce. However, the trial court found that the FAA did not apply to the arbitration clause because the termite-protection agreement involved a mostly local transaction and the parties had not contemplated substantial interstate activity when the agreement was made. Thus, the trial court applied the state law and refused to enforce the arbitration clause or stay the litigation. The case was appealed, and the Alabama Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s ruling. The United States Supreme Court accepted review of the case to address the FAA’s reach.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.