Allison v. Merck and Company
Nevada Supreme Court
878 P.2d 948 (1994)
- Written by Ross Sewell, JD
Facts
Thomas Allison (plaintiff), the son of Jo Ann Allison (plaintiff), received the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine when he was 17 months old. Merck pharmaceutical company (Merck) (defendant) manufactured the vaccine, and it was administered by the Clark County Health District (the health district) (defendant). The Allisons claimed that the vaccine caused Thomas to contract encephalitis and to suffer from consequent blindness, deafness, mental retardation, and spastic contractures. The Allisons sued Merck and the health district. Thomas claimed they were liable under strict products liability, and Ms. Allison claimed they were liable for failure to warn. Merck claimed comment k of § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts freed it from strict manufacturer’s liability. Merck also argued that holding it liable would deter necessary and beneficial research and development of new drugs. The trial court granted summary judgment for Merck and the health district. The Allisons appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Springer, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Young, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.