Allison v. Merck and Company

878 P.2d 948 (1994)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Allison v. Merck and Company

Nevada Supreme Court
878 P.2d 948 (1994)

Facts

Thomas Allison (plaintiff), the son of Jo Ann Allison (plaintiff), received the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine when he was 17 months old. Merck pharmaceutical company (Merck) (defendant) manufactured the vaccine, and it was administered by the Clark County Health District (the health district) (defendant). The Allisons claimed that the vaccine caused Thomas to contract encephalitis and to suffer from consequent blindness, deafness, mental retardation, and spastic contractures. The Allisons sued Merck and the health district. Thomas claimed they were liable under strict products liability, and Ms. Allison claimed they were liable for failure to warn. Merck claimed comment k of § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts freed it from strict manufacturer’s liability. Merck also argued that holding it liable would deter necessary and beneficial research and development of new drugs. The trial court granted summary judgment for Merck and the health district. The Allisons appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Springer, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Young, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership