Allstate Insurance Co. v. Burrough
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
120 F.3d 834 (1997)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) (plaintiff) insured 14-year-old Joel Mark Burrough (defendant) and his family under a policy that excluded coverage for intentional or criminal acts, regardless of whether an insured was actually charged with or convicted of a crime. Burrough associated with teenaged hooligans known for engaging in rowdy horseplay. Burrough stole his grandfather’s loaded handgun, which Burrough knew had misfired at least once, and gave it to his friends. While the boys were roughhousing, the gun accidentally discharged and wounded another youth. Burrough was indisputably guilty of violating the Arkansas statute against furnishing a deadly weapon to a minor, a misdemeanor for which Burrough could have been sentenced to juvenile detention, but prosecutors did not press charges. However, the gunshot-victim’s mother (defendant) claimed tort damages against Burrough. Allstate sued the mother and Burrough in federal district court and obtained a declaratory judgment that Burrough’s criminal act relieved Allstate of any duty to defend or indemnify Burrough against the mother’s claim. The mother appealed to the Eighth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Magill, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.