Allstate Insurance Co. v. McCarn
Michigan Supreme Court
683 N.W.2d 656 (2004)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) (plaintiff) insured 16-year-old Robert McCarn (defendant) and his grandparents, Ernest and Patricia McCarn (defendants). Allstate’s policy excluded coverage for the reasonably expected consequences of an insured’s intentional or criminal acts. Ernest kept a shotgun under his bed. The gun normally was unloaded. One day, while Robert and a friend were engaging in horseplay, after having smoked marijuana, Robert took Ernest’s shotgun and pointed it at his friend’s head. Robert believed that the gun was unloaded, but he was mistaken. When Robert squeezed the trigger, the loaded gun fired, killing Robert’s friend. The friend’s estate sued the McCarns for tort damages. Allstate invoked its policy’s criminal-acts exclusion and sued for a declaratory judgment relieving it of any duty to defend or indemnify the McCarns against the estate’s claim. The trial court entered judgment for the McCarns but was reversed on appeal. The McCarns appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Taylor, J.)
Dissent (Weaver, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.