Almendarez-Torres v. United States
United States Supreme Court
523 U.S. 224 (1998)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Almendarez-Torres (defendant) was convicted and sentenced for violating subsection (b) of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Subsection (a) stated that entry to the United States without permission by an alien who was formerly deported was a crime punishable by up to two years in prison. Subsection (a) was explicitly “subject to subsection (b).” Subsection (b) provided a penalty of up to 20 years in prison for any alien who was deported subsequent to an aggravated-felony conviction “notwithstanding subsection (a).” The title of the statutory section was, “Criminal penalties for reentry of certain deported aliens.” The government (plaintiff) did not include conviction of an aggravated felony as an element of the crime Almendarez-Torres was charged with in his indictment. Almendarez-Torres challenged the constitutionality of his conviction under subsection (b) in the United States Supreme Court, based on the absence of the aggravated-felony element in the indictment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.