Almetals, Inc. v. Wickeder Westfalenstahl, GmbH
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
67 UCC Rep. Serv. 2d 562 (2008)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Almetals, Inc. (plaintiff) entered into a requirements contract with Wickeder Westfalenstahl GmbH (Wickeder) (defendant). Under the contract, Wickeder agreed to provide clad metal to Almetals, which Almetals then sold to its customers in North America. Wickeder was the only supplier of the particular clad metal that Almetals needed, and no other manufacturer was able to produce the product. Under the "Customer Order and Protection Clause" of the contract, Wickeder agreed that after the agreement terminated, it would continue to honor any existing commitments to supply orders or complete programs for a period of 10 years. Wickeder later insisted on a cash-on-delivery (COD) payment term from Almetals. Almetals sought an injunction against Wickeder to prevent it from imposing the COD term. The district court found that the COD term was a violation of the parties’ contract and issued a temporary restraining order, prohibiting Wickeder from imposing the COD term. Almetals then sought a permanent injunction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Edmunds, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.