Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Almurbati v. Bush

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
366 F.Supp. 2d 72 (2005)


Facts

Six Bahraini nationals (plaintiffs) being held at Guantanamo Bay as enemy combatants by the United States government (the Government) (defendant) filed a petition for habeas corpus, seeking release from the prison. As part of the petition, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction forbidding the Government to transfer any of the plaintiffs out of the prison without 30 days’ notice to the court and counsel. The plaintiffs presented news reports that alleged that the Government is planning to reduce the prisoner population at Guantanamo Bay by half by transferring hundreds to prisons in Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and Yemen. The news reports also state that the Government has repeatedly transferred prisoners to countries that employ inhumane interrogation techniques. Finally, the plaintiffs allege that they were told by unnamed officials that they were going to be sent to a prison where they would be raped or turned into women. The Government responded with sworn declarations from high-level officials, stating that the Government consults with several agencies to ensure that transfers are not made that would result in torture or inhumane treatment. The declarations also stated that assurances of humane treatment are sought when required by the circumstances, and prisoners will not be transferred if concerns about mistreatment are not resolved. Additionally, all transfers from Guantanamo Bay, over 200 prisoners, have been back to the prisoners’ home country.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Walton, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.