Alta Health Strategies, Inc. v. Kennedy

790 F. Supp. 1085 (1992)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Alta Health Strategies, Inc. v. Kennedy

United States District Court for the District of Utah
790 F. Supp. 1085 (1992)

Facts

Alta Health Strategies, Inc. (Alta Health) (plaintiff) brought a motion to compel answers to three of its interrogatories to Kennedy and O’Donnell (defendants). The interrogatories asked Kennedy and O’Donnell to state every basis for their claim that one of Alta Health’s—or its agents’— statements constituted an admission. Alta Health contended that the interrogatories were proper under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 33(a)(2), which permits discovery of opinions and contentions that relate to fact and to the application of law to fact. Kennedy and O’Donnell objected to the interrogatories and resisted the motion to compel. Kennedy and O’Donnell claimed attorney-work-product protection under FRCP 26(b)(3). Kennedy and O’Donnell specifically fought the interrogatories under the part of the rule that protects an attorney’s thoughts and mental impressions from discovery.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 781,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership