From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Altkrug v. William Whitman Co.
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
185 A.D. 744, 173 N.Y.S. 669 (1919)
Julius Altkrug (plaintiff) entered into contracts to purchase wool products from William Whitman Company, Inc. (Whitman) (defendant). However, Altkrug refused to accept the products. Altkrug filed suit against Whitman, contending that the products were of poor quality. Later, Whitman sold the products that Altkrug had rejected to other customers. These customers did not complain about the quality of the products. At the trial, Whitman sought to introduce evidence regarding the absence of customer complaints about the products that Altkrug had rejected. The customers who purchased the products did not testify. Further, the evidence was offered to prove the good quality of the products. The trial court admitted the evidence. Subsequently, the jury ruled in favor of Whitman. Altkrug appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 619,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.