Alvarez v. City of Brownsville
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
904 F.3d 382 (2018)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
George Alvarez (plaintiff) was involved in a fight with a police officer for the city of Brownsville (Brownsville) (defendant) while Alvarez was being transferred from a holding area to a padded room because he had begun acting disorderly. Alvarez was charged in Texas state court with assault on a public servant. Alvarez pleaded guilty. Four years later, it was discovered that the prosecution failed to disclose a video of the incident that tended to show Alvarez’s innocence. Alvarez filed a writ of habeas corpus with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which found that Alvarez was innocent of the assault charge. The criminal charges against Alvarez were dismissed. Alvarez filed a civil-rights claim against Brownsville in federal district court and was awarded a $2.3 million judgment. Brownsville appealed. A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that Alvarez’s civil-rights claim should be dismissed and the monetary judgment reversed. Alvarez sought an en banc rehearing from the Fifth Circuit, arguing that the prosecution’s failure to disclose the video constituted a Brady violation because it was exculpatory evidence and, therefore, Alvarez was constitutionally entitled to its disclosure prior to his entry of a guilty plea.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, C.J.)
Concurrence (Ho, J.)
Dissent (Costa, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.