Alverio v. Sam’s Warehouse Club, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
253 F.3d 933 (2001)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Carmen Alverio (plaintiff) claimed she was sexually harassed by her manager while employed by Sam’s Warehouse Club, Inc. (Sam’s) (defendant). Alverio sued. The venire was made up of 11 men and three women, and Sam’s used its peremptory challenges to strike all three women during voir dire. Alverio raised a Batson challenge, arguing that Sam’s had struck the female jurors solely on the basis of gender. Sam’s attorney had to explain the reason for each strike. Sam’s attorney claimed one woman was struck due to her unemployment, one because she had previously been a plaintiff in a lawsuit, and one because she worked at an insurance company and might have come in contact with his law firm. The attorney indicated that all three women had limited work, education, and business experience. Incidentally, Alverio struck the three most educated men from the venire. The judge accepted Sam’s attorney’s explanation, and the matter went to trial. The jury returned a verdict for Sam’s. Alverio’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial were denied. Alverio appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Evans, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.