Logourl black

Ambach v. Norwick

United States Supreme Court
441 U.S. 68 (1979)


Facts

Under New York Education Law § 3001(3), a person who is not a citizen of the United States may not be certified as a public school teacher, unless that person has manifested an intention to apply for citizenship. Norwick (plaintiff) was born in Scotland and was a subject of Great Britain. She had resided in the United States since 1965 and married a United States citizen. Dachinger (plaintiff) was a Finnish subject who came to the United States in 1966 and also married a United States citizen. Norwick and Dachinger met all the educational requirements New York set for certification as a public school teacher. However, Norwick and Dachinger both refused to seek citizenship despite their eligibility to do so, and as a result were denied certification as public school teachers for failure to meet the requirements of § 3001(3). Norwick and Dachinger filed suit against Ambach (defendant) in federal district court on the grounds that § 3001(3) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. The district court held the statute was unconstitutional due to its over-breadth, and Ambach appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Blackmun, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 86,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,053 briefs - keyed to 161 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now