American Academy of Family Physicians v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
91 F.3d 1155 (1996)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
The American Academy of Family Physicians (academy) (plaintiff) was tax-exempt as a business league under § 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code (code). The academy owned and sponsored several types of insurance plans for its members. Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company (Principal) underwrote the plans. Under the agreement between the academy and Principal, plan holders paid premiums to Principal, which set aside those premiums in reserves out of which Principal paid claims. Upon termination of all policies and all claims, the academy would be entitled to any remaining reserve funds. Until that time, Principal was free to manage the investment of the reserve funds. Principal was required to pay a fixed amount of the reserve funds to the academy every year, regardless of how profitable the insurance plans had been that year. The academy did not pay taxes on Principal’s payments to the academy. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) determined that those payments were unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) and taxable to the academy, notwithstanding the academy’s § 501(c)(6) status. The academy paid the assessed taxes and sued the United States (defendant) for a refund. The district court ruled that the payments were not UBTI and ordered the United States to issue a refund. The United States appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fagg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.