American Academy of Religion v. Chertoff
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
463 F. Supp. 2d 400 (2006)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Tariq Ramadan (plaintiff) was an internationally renowned scholar of Islam and Muslim identity. Ramadan advocated for a middle ground between isolationism and assimilation for Muslims living in non-Muslim countries, was critical of both Islamic extremism and Western military intervention in the Middle East, and was involved in efforts to combat extremism. When Ramadan was offered a position at an American university, he applied for an H-1B visa. Although the visa was initially approved, Ramadan was later informed that it had been revoked. A government spokesman informed a newspaper that the visa had been revoked under a federal law that refused entry to aliens who espoused terrorist activity, although the government later denied that any decision had been reached on the visa. Ramadan then applied for a nonimmigration visa, but the government failed to render any decision on that application for months. A group of American scholarly organizations (plaintiffs) joined Ramadan in suing the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State (defendants), alleging among other claims that the government’s exclusion of Ramadan was based on his political views and therefore violated their First Amendment rights. The organizations sought a preliminary injunction so that Ramadan could enter the United States.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Crotty, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.