American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union v. Martin
Texas Supreme Court
29 S.W.3d 86 (2000)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Tim Martin (plaintiff) opened an account at the American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union (credit union) (defendant). The credit union’s agreement with its members stated that members were required to give notice of an unauthorized draw on their account within 60 days of the credit union mailing an account statement. The credit union received a membership-change notice adding Molly Blair to Martin’s account. The notice contained a signature purporting to be Martin’s, but this signature turned out to be a forgery. Blair was also a member of the credit union and made 14 transfers totaling $49,800 to her account from Martin’s. Most but not all these transfers, as well as Blair’s status as a joint accountholder, appeared on Martin’s quarterly statements. Martin claimed that he did not receive these statements. When Martin realized that his account balance was lower than anticipated, he sued the credit union to recover the transferred funds. The credit union relied on the 60-day-notice provision in the membership agreement. Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 4.406(d) required bank accountholders to report an unauthorized draw from the account within one year. The credit union argued that this timeline could be modified by agreement. The trial court disagreed and ruled in Martin’s favor. The court of appeals affirmed. The credit union appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Enoch, J.)
Dissent (Abbott, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.