American Civil Liberties Union of Florida v. Miami-Dade County School Board

557 F.3d 1177 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Civil Liberties Union of Florida v. Miami-Dade County School Board

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
557 F.3d 1177 (2009)

  • Written by Ann Wooster, JD

Facts

A series of children’s books that provided basic information about other countries was offered in the nonfiction sections of public-school libraries of the Miami-Dade County School Board (school board) (defendant). The father of an elementary-school student filed a request to have the series book about Cuba removed from the shelves of the public libraries due to factual inaccuracies. The father spoke with the elementary school’s principal, who denied the request. The father submitted a formal request to the school district’s committee, which denied the request. The father appealed the committee’s decision to the school district superintendent, who submitted the appeal to the school-district committee. The committee evaluated the book based on educational significance, appropriateness, and accuracy, then voted to recommend that the superintendent retain the book in the public libraries. The superintendent adopted the committee’s recommendation. The father appealed the superintendent’s decision to the school board. At its next meeting, the school board took up the appeal, heard comments from community members, and voted to remove the book from public-school libraries due to its inaccuracies and omissions. The American Civil Liberties Union of Florida and a student-government association (plaintiffs) filed suit against the school board in the district court and claimed that the school board violated their members’ rights to freedom of speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court enjoined the school board from enforcing its removal order. The school board appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Carnes, J.)

Dissent (Wilson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership