American Civil Liberties Union v. Central Intelligence Agency
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
710 F.3d 422 (2013)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) (plaintiff) filed a request with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (defendant) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), seeking records held by the CIA related to the use of drones for targeted killings. The CIA issued a Glomar response, refusing to confirm or deny the existence of such records because doing so would harm national security by revealing whether the CIA was involved or had an intelligence interest in drone strikes. The ACLU argued that the CIA could not rely on a Glomar response because the existence of such records had already been officially acknowledged by government representatives. Specifically, the ACLU pointed to public statements by the president regarding drone strikes against al-Qaeda targets and a statement by a former CIA director discussing the efficiency and precision of drone strikes. The district court granted summary judgment in the CIA’s favor, upholding the CIA’s issuance of a Glomar response. The ACLU appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Garland, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.