American Civil Liberties Union v. National Security Agency

493 F.3d 644 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Civil Liberties Union v. National Security Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
493 F.3d 644 (2007)

SC

Facts

The National Security Agency (NSA) (defendant) established the Terrorist Surveillance Program, which, without a warrant, intercepted communications if the sender or recipient was located outside the United States and the NSA believed the sender or recipient was part of or working with al Qaeda. The American Civil Liberties Union and others (collectively, ACLU) (plaintiffs) sued the NSA, claiming that the program was unconstitutional. The ACLU alleged that it frequently communicated with individuals outside the United States who might be subject to the NSA’s warrantless surveillance. The ACLU argued that the program violated the First Amendment due to the program’s chilling effect on the ACLU’s international communications. The ACLU claimed that it was harmed because it either had to refrain from communicating with its contacts to avoid the surveillance or had to incur the cost of traveling overseas to communicate in person. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan agreed and granted the ACLU summary judgment, finding the program to be unconstitutional. The NSA appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Batchelder, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership