American Computer Trust Leasing v. Jack Farrell Implement Co.

763 F. Supp. 1473 (1991)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Computer Trust Leasing v. Jack Farrell Implement Co.

United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
763 F. Supp. 1473 (1991)

Facts

American Computer Trust Leasing (ACTL) (plaintiff), a computer-hardware leasing firm, was affiliated with Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP), a software firm. Boerboom International, Inc. (Boerboom) (defendant) and Jack Farrell Implement Co. (Farrell) (defendant) were agricultural-equipment dealers that both leased computer hardware from ACTL and licensed software designed by ADP especially for farm-equipment dealerships. Boerboom and Farrell signed software-license agreements warning that a licensee’s default could result in cancellation of the license. Both Boerboom and Farrell defaulted, and after Farrell’s account became significantly past due, ADP notified Farrell in June 1987 that it would terminate all processing and support services on July 8, 1987 if payments were not then made. On that date, ADP deactivated Farrell’s software. After Farrell noticed the deactivation, it brought its account current, which resulted in reactivation of Farrell’s licensed software. According to ADP, however, Farrell then not only disconnected its modem to prevent ADP from accessing Farrell’s system but also failed to make any further payments. Additionally, Boerboom requested deactivation of its licensed software when it changed to another type of computer system, so ADP complied with Boerboom’s deactivation request. ACTL sued Boerboom and Farrell for nonpayment of computer-hardware lease payments that had become due. Farrell and Boerboom defended on the ground that the hardware did not work properly, and they asserted a counterclaim against both ACTL and ADP for alleged violation of federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) arising from their software deactivations. ATCL moved for summary judgment on the RICO counterclaim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Doty, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership