American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration

965 F.2d 962 (1992)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
965 F.2d 962 (1992)

Facts

In 1989, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (defendant) issued a revised air-contaminants standard applicable to 428 toxic workplace substances. The revised standard reduced the permissible exposure limits (PELs) for many toxic substances that were already regulated. During the rulemaking process, OSHA grouped the 428 substances into 18 groups based on the type of health effects at issue (i.e., sensory irritation, cancer) and considered the medical impact of each type of impairment. OSHA also considered studies about the health effects of individual substances at various exposure levels but did not quantify the risks associated with each individual substance and, for many, adopted PELs much lower than justified by the evidence. The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations and other industry groups and individual companies (plaintiffs) filed challenges to the final revised air-contaminants standard in multiple federal courts of appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fay, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership