American Home Assurance Co. v. De Los Santos
Texas Court of Appeals
2012 WL 131410 (2012)
- Written by Whitney Punzone, JD
Facts
Juan De Los Santos was an employee of Ram Production Services (Ram). Juan was given a company truck to perform his work duties, which included daily traveling to jobsites within the Buck Hamilton Ranch (the ranch). Juan’s work began at 6:00 a.m. On June 29, 2005, at 5:50 a.m., Juan De Los Santos was fatally injured in a car accident while driving from home to work at the ranch. At the time of the accident, Juan was traveling to the ranch to meet a work-related acquittance, Rogelio Clarke, to perform work on a well. While speaking with Clarke, Juan agreed to bring a barrel to the well to catch petroleum. Ram did not schedule this meeting. Noela De Los Santos (plaintiff), Juan’s widow, filed a claim for workers’-compensation benefits on behalf of herself and their child. The Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation, denied her benefits, finding that Juan’s fatal injury did not occur in the course of his employment. Noela filed a petition for review with the trial court. Insurance carrier American Home Assurance Company (American Home) (defendant) and Noela both filed motions for summary judgment on the issue of whether Juan was injured in the course and scope of his employment. The trial court granted Noela’s motion for summary judgment and issued a final judgment in her favor. American Home appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Angelini, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.