Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

American Hospital Association v. Bowen

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
834 F.2d 1037 (1987)


Facts

In 1982, Congress amended the Medicare system to create Peer Review Organizations (PROs), which are private organizations of doctors that monitor some or all of the professional activities of Medicaid providers in their area. The primary purpose of a PRO is to review the compliance of health care providers with the Medicare Act. In creating PROs, Congress left the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (defendant) with broad discretion to implement the PRO system. HHS issued a number of regulations to govern the PRO program, as well as a series of directives and transmittals. The directives and transmittals—which contained a wide variety of instructions, guidelines, and procedures related to the PRO system—were issued without notice or comment. The American Hospital Association (AHA) (plaintiff) filed a petition with HHS for rulemaking. In support of its petition, the AHA argued that the body of regulations that HHS had issued regarding the PRO program was small and incomplete and that the bulk of the procedures governing PROs were not published as regulations. After HHS failed to respond to the AHA’s petition, the AHA sued HHS, arguing that HHS had circumvented the notice and comment requirements of § 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in issuing the directives and transmittals. The AHA sought to have these directives and transmittals declared invalid.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Wald, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.