American Immigration Lawyers Association v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
830 F.3d 667 (2016)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) (plaintiff) filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Department of Justice (DOJ) (defendant), seeking records of all complaints against the DOJ’s immigration judges. After six months of no response, AILA filed suit in federal district court seeking the information. Subsequently, the DOJ provided substantial complaint records but redacted the names of the immigration judges. Instead, the DOJ provided three-digit codes for each immigration judge to permit the tracking of judges subject to multiple complaints. In redacting the names, the DOJ invoked Exemption 6 under FOIA, which exempted from disclosure personnel files, “the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” The district court granted the DOJ summary judgment, finding that its redaction was valid. AILA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Srinivasan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.