American Key Corp. v. Cole National Corp.

762 F.2d 1569 (1985)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Key Corp. v. Cole National Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
762 F.2d 1569 (1985)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

American Key Corp. (plaintiff) was a key shop. In 1977 American Key rented space in Cumberland Mall (the mall) in Atlanta, Georgia, which was owned by Cumberland Associates (Cumberland). Carter & Associates, Inc. (Carter), a rental agent who worked for Cumberland, negotiated the lease. A Sears (defendant) store inside the mall housed a key shop operated by Cole National Corp. (Cole) (defendant). American Key began experiencing financial difficulties. In 1980, after American Key wrote four checks that were returned for insufficient funds, Carter decided not to renew American Key’s lease. Carter and Cumberland allowed American Key to remain in the mall for 30 days after its lease expired and sent a contract to American Key laying out the terms of the agreement. American Key returned the contract to Carter and Cumberland but altered the contract to allow American Key to remain in the mall for 30 years after its lease expired, rather than 30 days. Carter filed a lawsuit in state court seeking to evict American Key. In response, American Key filed a lawsuit in federal district court against Sears and Cole, alleging that the companies violated § 2 of the Sherman Act by attempting to monopolize the sale of replacement keys in large shopping malls. To support its claims, American Key presented expert testimony from Dr. Henry concluding that Sears and Cole had monopoly power in the purported relevant markets. To craft his testimony, Dr. Henry relied on facts alleged by American Key. Sears and Cole moved for summary judgment. The district court granted the motions, finding that the relevant product market in the case was replacement keys and that the relevant geographic market included large malls, hardware stores, drug stores, and locksmiths. The district court concluded that American Key had failed to produce evidence showing that Sears or Cole had monopoly power in the relevant markets. American Key appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Atkins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership