Logourl black

American Machine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
166 F.2d 535 (1948)


Facts

American Machine & Metals, Inc. (American Machine) (plaintiff) entered into an agreement with De Bothezat Impeller Co. (De Bothezat) (defendant). Under the contract, De Bothezat conveyed certain patents to American Machine, and American Machine agreed to pay De Bothezat license fees based on the net sales of its products, regardless of whether its products were covered by the patents. After 12 years, American Machine stopped manufacturing or selling any product that required possession of the patents. As a result, American Machine wanted to terminate the agreement and continue manufacturing and selling its non-infringing products. However, American Machine was reluctant to do so because De Bothezat said that upon termination of the contract, American Machine would no longer have the right to manufacture or sell the non-infringing products, and because De Bothezat threatened to sue American Machine if it did so. American Machine brought this action seeking a declaration of its rights under the agreement to continue manufacturing and selling the non-infringing products after the termination of the contract. The district court dismissed the action because American Machine had not terminated the contract. Therefore, no controversy yet existed under the Declaratory Judgment Act. American Machine appealed on the grounds that the district court’s dismissal was improper.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Swan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 78,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 10,692 briefs - keyed to 140 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now