American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. Sullivan
United States Supreme Court
526 U.S. 40, 119 S. Ct. 977, 143 L. Ed. 2d 130 (1999)
Facts
Instead of filing lawsuits, workers in Pennsylvania were required to use the state’s workers’-compensation system to receive compensation for on-the-job injuries. When the workers’-compensation system was first implemented, most employers bought insurance to cover potential workers’-compensation claims. However, a provision of the workers’-compensation law requiring insurers to pay claims within 30 days resulted in the payment of unjustified claims, which could not later be reimbursed, driving up employers’ insurance premiums. Therefore, the provision was amended to allow insurers to deny claims if they notified the state and privately arbitrated disputes arising from denied claims. Although businesses were required to notify the state of denied claims, the state was not empowered to approve or deny the notices. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company (insurer) (defendant) denied several employees’(plaintiffs) workers’-compensation claims. The employees filed a lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arguing that the workers’-compensation system was so heavily regulated by the state that the insurer’s workers’-compensation decisions were joint private-state decisions and thus the insurer had acted under color of state law in denying the employees’ claims. The district court dismissed the suit. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit found for the employees, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 708,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.