American Petroleum Institute v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
858 F.2d 261 (1988)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) issued regulations that effectively required offshore drilling companies to use mineral oil, as opposed to diesel oil, as a lubricant additive to the mud used to lubricate the drilling pipe on offshore rigs off the coast of Alaska. Typically, mud was used to lubricate the drilling pipe, and this mud could be disposed of in the waters surrounding the rig. However, occasionally an additional lubricant was needed. This additional lubricant, in the form of a pill, consisted of more mud and a considerable amount of diesel oil or mineral oil. According to EPA regulations, if these pills contained diesel oil, they could not be disposed of in the water surrounding the rig but rather could only be disposed of in hazardous waste sites on land. If the pills contained mineral oil, they could be disposed of in the water surrounding the rig. This effectively required offshore companies to use mineral oil rather than diesel oil. The American Petroleum Institute (API) and four oil companies (plaintiffs) challenged this regulation.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.