American Petroleum Institute v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

858 F.2d 261 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Petroleum Institute v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
858 F.2d 261 (1988)

Facts

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) issued regulations that effectively required offshore drilling companies to use mineral oil, as opposed to diesel oil, as a lubricant additive to the mud used to lubricate the drilling pipe on offshore rigs off the coast of Alaska. Typically, mud was used to lubricate the drilling pipe, and this mud could be disposed of in the waters surrounding the rig. However, occasionally an additional lubricant was needed. This additional lubricant, in the form of a pill, consisted of more mud and a considerable amount of diesel oil or mineral oil. According to EPA regulations, if these pills contained diesel oil, they could not be disposed of in the water surrounding the rig but rather could only be disposed of in hazardous waste sites on land. If the pills contained mineral oil, they could be disposed of in the water surrounding the rig. This effectively required offshore companies to use mineral oil rather than diesel oil. The American Petroleum Institute (API) and four oil companies (plaintiffs) challenged this regulation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership